Sheena Brar
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
645
231
68
13
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 68 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Sheena Brar's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Sheena Brar typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 13 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Sheena Brar's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Sheena Brar typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Substantial Interference8
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Bad Faith Eviction7
Landlord Win Rate: 28.57%
- Property Damage6
Landlord Win Rate: 83.33%
- Harassment4
Landlord Win Rate: 25%
- Maintenance Issues3
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
- Illegal Act2
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
Unlock Full Access to Sheena Brar's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Sheena Brar typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Deacon
Landlord successfully obtains an order for $261.68 in rent arrears from former tenants who had already vacated the property.
Tang v Corcoran
Landlord's application for rent arrears was dismissed after the LTB ruled the tenant's N9 notice sent via text message was valid.
Centurion Property Associates Inc v Trudel
London tenants ordered to pay over $5,000 in rent arrears after vacating the unit and failing to attend the LTB hearing.
Sterling Silver Development Corporation v Muhoza
A Toronto tenant faces eviction after accumulating over $8,000 in rent arrears due to job loss, as the LTB denied her proposed payment plan.
Coal Harbour Properties Limited Partnership v Hunter
Toronto tenant faces eviction for over $5,400 in rent arrears after failing to attend the LTB hearing, with an option to void by paying the full amount.
London tenants who vacated their unit after a non-payment notice were ordered to pay their corporate landlord $540.68 in outstanding rent and fees.
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Deacon
Landlord successfully obtains an order for $261.68 in rent arrears from former tenants who had already vacated the property.
Tang v Corcoran
Landlord's application for rent arrears was dismissed after the LTB ruled the tenant's N9 notice sent via text message was valid.
Centurion Property Associates Inc v Trudel
London tenants ordered to pay over $5,000 in rent arrears after vacating the unit and failing to attend the LTB hearing.
Sterling Silver Development Corporation v Muhoza
A Toronto tenant faces eviction after accumulating over $8,000 in rent arrears due to job loss, as the LTB denied her proposed payment plan.
Coal Harbour Properties Limited Partnership v Hunter
Toronto tenant faces eviction for over $5,400 in rent arrears after failing to attend the LTB hearing, with an option to void by paying the full amount.
London tenants who vacated their unit after a non-payment notice were ordered to pay their corporate landlord $540.68 in outstanding rent and fees.
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Deacon
Landlord successfully obtains an order for $261.68 in rent arrears from former tenants who had already vacated the property.
Tang v Corcoran
Landlord's application for rent arrears was dismissed after the LTB ruled the tenant's N9 notice sent via text message was valid.
Centurion Property Associates Inc v Trudel
London tenants ordered to pay over $5,000 in rent arrears after vacating the unit and failing to attend the LTB hearing.
Sterling Silver Development Corporation v Muhoza
A Toronto tenant faces eviction after accumulating over $8,000 in rent arrears due to job loss, as the LTB denied her proposed payment plan.
Coal Harbour Properties Limited Partnership v Hunter
Toronto tenant faces eviction for over $5,400 in rent arrears after failing to attend the LTB hearing, with an option to void by paying the full amount.
London tenants who vacated their unit after a non-payment notice were ordered to pay their corporate landlord $540.68 in outstanding rent and fees.
Interrent Holdings Manager LP v Deacon
Landlord successfully obtains an order for $261.68 in rent arrears from former tenants who had already vacated the property.
Tang v Corcoran
Landlord's application for rent arrears was dismissed after the LTB ruled the tenant's N9 notice sent via text message was valid.
Centurion Property Associates Inc v Trudel
London tenants ordered to pay over $5,000 in rent arrears after vacating the unit and failing to attend the LTB hearing.
Sterling Silver Development Corporation v Muhoza
A Toronto tenant faces eviction after accumulating over $8,000 in rent arrears due to job loss, as the LTB denied her proposed payment plan.
Coal Harbour Properties Limited Partnership v Hunter
Toronto tenant faces eviction for over $5,400 in rent arrears after failing to attend the LTB hearing, with an option to void by paying the full amount.
London tenants who vacated their unit after a non-payment notice were ordered to pay their corporate landlord $540.68 in outstanding rent and fees.
Unlock Full Access to Sheena Brar's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Sheena Brar typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
When Payment Plans Fail: Understanding Breach of Conditional Orders and Second Chances at the LTB
Exploring what happens when tenants default on LTB-ordered payment plans, the strict consequences of breaching conditional orders, and the rare circumstances where further relief might be granted in Ontario.
When Rent Is Not Paid: What Landlords and Tenants Need to Know in Ontario
A comprehensive guide to understanding the legal process, rights, and remedies when rent payments fall behind in Ontario's rental market.
When Landlords Cry Wolf: Analyzing False Claims and Bad Faith Applications at the LTB
A comprehensive analysis of dismissed landlord applications, bad faith eviction attempts, and frivolous claims reveals the consequences when property owners abuse the LTB system.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform